Many companies receive letters from PicRights, or similar bodies, aimed at collecting licence fees for the use of allegedly protected photographs. These letters state that a "protected" photo has been used on your website or materials, and demand payment of a licence fee of several hundred euros.
What is striking about these letters: the body takes care not to mention that the recipient may consult a lawyer. And if you do not respond, the invoice grows exponentially.
To understand the legal basis of such claims, see our page on intellectual property law.
Not necessarily. And this is often where the first line of defence lies.
Copyright protection of a photograph is not automatic: it requires showing the originality of the work, that is, that the photo reflects the author's personal creative input, beyond its mere technical aspects (standard framing, neutral lighting, banal subject).
PicRights or its principals are not always able to prove this condition. Do not hesitate to ask them to establish concretely how the photograph in question meets the originality criterion.
Do not be intimidated by the peremptory tone of these letters.
Each claim is different and there is no universal answer. However, several lines of defence can be explored depending on the situation:
These situations sometimes also fall under unfair competition and free riding.
I have already assisted clients who received this type of claim, by challenging the protection invoked or by negotiating an amicable resolution. Each situation is different and no result can be guaranteed.
Do not respond hastily and do not pay without having analysed the situation. Contact me for an initial analysis of your matter.